--- description: Gedetailleerde beoordelingen over BrowserStack: functies, prijzen, gebruiksgemak en scores. Met een duidelijk overzicht van de plus- en minpunten. Vergelijk BrowserStack met soortgelijke producten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack reviews, prijzen en scores | GetApp Nederland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startpagina](/) > [Bug tracking software](/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.getapp.nl/software/170655/browserstack Pagina: 1 / 31\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.getapp.nl/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack is een testplatform voor meerdere browsers waarmee ontwikkelaars tools kunnen integreren om geautomatiseerde, visuele en live tests op mobiele toepassingen en websites uit te voeren. DevOps-teams kunnen ook lokale tests op WIP-toepassingen (Work In Progress) uitvoeren zonder deze in openbare omgevingen te hosten. > > Oordeel: score van **4.6/5** door 749 gebruikers. Hoge score voor **Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling**. ----- ## Snelle statistieken en scores | Metriek | Score | Details | | **In totaal** | **4.6/5** | 749 Reviews | | Gebruiksgemak | 4.6/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Klantenondersteuning | 4.4/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding | 4.2/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Functies | 4.5/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Aanbevelingspercentage | 90% | (9/10 Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling) | ## Over de leverancier - **Bedrijf**: BrowserStack - **Opgericht**: 2011 ## Commerciële context - **Beginprijs**: US$ 39,00 - **Prijsmodel**: (Gratis versie beschikbaar) (Gratis proef) - **Doelgroep**: Zelfstandig ondernemer, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementatie en platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Ondersteunde talen**: Engels - **Beschikbare landen**: Amerikaanse Maagdeneilanden, Australië, Brazilië, Britse Maagdeneilanden, Canada, Denemarken, Duitsland, Ierland, India, Israël, Mexico, Singapore, Verenigd Koninkrijk, Verenigde Arabische Emiraten, Verenigde Staten, Zuid-Afrika ## Functies - A/B Testing - AI/machine learning - API - Aanpasbare categorieën - Aanpasbare rapporten - Aanpasbare sjablonen - Aanpasbare velden - Aanpasbare vragen - Actiewoorden testen - Activiteiten volgen - Activiteitendashboard - Alerts/Escalation - Annotaties - Anomaliedetectie - Archiveren en retentie - Assetdetectie - Auditbeheer - Audittrail - Automated Testing - Beheer van enquêtes/peilingen ## Integraties (16 in totaal) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... en 1 meer integraties ## Ondersteuningsopties - E-mail/helpdesk - Veelgestelde vragen/forum - Kennisbank - Telefonische ondersteuning - Chatten ## Categorie - [Bug tracking software](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) ## Gerelateerde categorieën - [Bug tracking software](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Load testing software](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [User testing software](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/2075/user-testing/software) - [Test management tools](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Automated testing tools](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/389/testing/software) ## Alternatieven 1. [Lyssna](https://www.getapp.nl/software/2041995/usabilityhub-1) — 4.6/5 (86 reviews) 2. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.nl/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (177 reviews) 3. [Userlytics](https://www.getapp.nl/software/121415/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 4. [Userbrain](https://www.getapp.nl/software/130543/userbrain) — 4.2/5 (88 reviews) 5. [Hotjar](https://www.getapp.nl/software/101789/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (539 reviews) ## Reviews ### "A reliable option for browser testing" — 4.0/5 > **Miranda** | *21 april 2025* | Informatietechnologie en -diensten | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Very usable interface and generous free trial options (a range of different operating system options, etc.). > > **Minpunten**: The first time I tested (back in 2023), there was a bug that prevented me from seeing the website in real-time. Since then, I believe the product has become more reliable. ----- ### "A Reliable Testing Companion That Takes the Hassle Out of Cross-Browser Work" — 5.0/5 > **Vandit** | *24 maart 2026* | Informatietechnologie en -diensten | Aanbevelingsscore: 9.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: What I liked most about BrowserStack is how much time it saved me from setting up and maintaining different testing environments. Instead of juggling virtual machines or physical devices, I can just pick a browser or device and start testing instantly. In my day-to-day work, this has been really helpful for catching cross-browser issues early, especially during regression cycles. The real device testing feels reliable, and the automation support made it easier to run repetitive test cases without much manual effort. I also found the platform straightforward to use after a short learning phase, and overall it genuinely helped improve my productivity and confidence before pushing releases. > > **Minpunten**: One thing I liked least about BrowserStack is that it can feel a bit slow at times, especially when launching certain devices or running multiple sessions in parallel. During busy testing cycles, this can slightly impact the overall workflow. Also, there’s a bit of a learning curve when you first start using some of the advanced features, particularly around automation setup and integrations. While it gets easier with time, the initial setup can take some effort. That said, these issues haven’t been deal-breakers for me, and overall the platform still delivers strong value in day-to-day testing. > > Overall, using BrowserStack has felt less like adding another tool and more like removing a headache from my workflow. As a developer, I used to spend a lot of time worrying about environment setup and cross-browser inconsistencies—but with BrowserStack, that’s mostly off my plate. What stood out to me is how quickly I can jump between devices and browsers and actually see how things behave in real-world conditions. It’s been especially useful during last-minute checks before releases, where confidence really matters. It’s not perfect—there are moments when sessions take a bit longer than expected—but it hasn’t really disrupted my flow in a major way. Once I got past the initial learning curve, it became something I naturally rely on. In short, it’s one of those tools that quietly improves your day-to-day work without you realizing how much effort it’s saving you until you try working without it. ----- ### "Browserstack Review" — 3.0/5 > **udit** | *22 september 2025* | Informatietechnologie en -diensten | Aanbevelingsscore: 6.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Ease of using Apple Pay testing in India. It was a good experience using apay via BrowserStack + a lot of other features that BrowserStack provide,s as bug capture > > **Minpunten**: The BrowserStack gets stuck sometimes, and we have to end the session. So we can start again, but by doing this, we lose our work progress > > Access to a large library of real devices: A key advantage for developers and QA teams is the ability to test websites and mobile apps on thousands of combinations of real devices, browsers, and operating systems without needing a physical device lab. Robust testing capabilities: The platform supports both manual "Live" testing and automated testing using popular frameworks like Selenium, Playwright, and Appium. This allows for comprehensive functional, regression, and UI testing. ----- ### "A Game-Changer for QA Teams" — 5.0/5 > **Abhilash** | *23 maart 2026* | Bankwezen | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: - Ease of Use: The platform is very intuitive and easy to navigate. - Wide Device Coverage: It provides access to a huge range of real devices and browsers for testing. - Reliability: Tests run smoothly with minimal downtime or glitches. - Cross-Browser Testing: Saves time by allowing you to test across multiple browsers and operating systems quickly. - Integration: Works well with CI/CD pipelines and popular tools like Jenkins, GitHub, and Jira. - Support: Helpful documentation and responsive customer support. - BrowserStack’s automation capabilities made it easy to run parallel tests across multiple browsers and devices, saving time and ensuring reliable results. > > **Minpunten**: - Performance Issues: Tests can sometimes feel slow, especially on real devices. - Session Limits: Limited parallel sessions can restrict productivity. - Network Latency: Occasionally, there can be lag depending on internet speed. - Complexity for Beginners: New users may need time to understand advanced features. - Integration Challenges: Some integrations require extra setup effort. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. The platform is user-friendly, offers extensive device and browser coverage, and integrates smoothly with existing workflows. It has significantly improved the efficiency of our cross-browser testing. While there are occasional performance lags and limitations with parallel sessions, the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks, making it a reliable solution for comprehensive testing needs. ----- ### "All-in-One Solution for Cross-Browser and Device Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Geverifieerde reviewer** | *23 maart 2026* | Informatietechnologie en -diensten | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: What I like most about BrowserStack is its ability to provide instant access to a wide range of real devices and browsers without the need for maintaining physical infrastructure. It significantly reduces testing time by enabling parallel execution and supports seamless cross-browser and cross-device testing. The platform is very user-friendly, integrates well with CI/CD tools, and helps in identifying issues early with reliable results. Additionally, features like live testing, automation support, and detailed debugging tools enhance overall testing efficiency and team productivity. > > **Minpunten**: One of the main challenges with BrowserStack is occasional performance lag, especially during peak usage, which can impact real-time testing. The pricing can also be relatively high for smaller teams or startups. Additionally, debugging issues in automated tests can sometimes be less straightforward compared to local environments, and session timeouts or connectivity issues may interrupt longer test executions. While the platform is feature-rich, initial setup and configuration for advanced use cases can have a slight learning curve. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It has significantly streamlined our testing process by enabling reliable cross-browser and cross-device testing on real devices without the need for maintaining in-house infrastructure. The platform is easy to use, integrates well with automation tools and CI/CD pipelines, and supports both manual and automated testing effectively. It has helped improve test coverage, reduce execution time through parallel runs, and identify issues early in the development cycle. While there are occasional performance lags and some limitations in debugging complex scenarios, the overall stability, scalability, and convenience of the platform make it a valuable tool for ensuring high-quality releases. ----- Pagina: 1 / 31\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.getapp.nl/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [Bekijk op GetApp](https://www.getapp.nl/software/170655/browserstack) ## Deze pagina is beschikbaar in de volgende talen | Locatie | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Gestructureerde gegevens