--- description: Gedetailleerde beoordelingen over Ideagen Please Review: functies, prijzen, gebruiksgemak en scores. Met een duidelijk overzicht van de plus- en minpunten. Vergelijk Ideagen Please Review met soortgelijke producten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Ideagen Please Review reviews, prijzen en scores | GetApp Nederland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startpagina](/) > [Collaboration software](/directory/335/web-collaboration/software) > [Ideagen Please Review](/software/121535/ideagen-proposal-management-software) # Ideagen Please Review Canonical: https://www.getapp.nl/software/121535/ideagen-proposal-management-software > Ideagen PleaseReview is software voor documentbeoordeling, co-authoring en redactie die is ontworpen om gebruikers te helpen het proces van het maken van voorstellen te stroomlijnen en te beheren, zodat teams documenten snel en veilig kunnen produceren met realtime samenwerkingstools, beveiligde interne/externe documenttoegang en meer. > > Oordeel: score van **4.5/5** door 4 gebruikers. Hoge score voor **Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling**. ----- ## Snelle statistieken en scores | Metriek | Score | Details | | **In totaal** | **4.5/5** | 4 Reviews | | Gebruiksgemak | 4.5/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Klantenondersteuning | 4.7/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding | 4.7/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Functies | 4.5/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Aanbevelingspercentage | 90% | (9/10 Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling) | ## Over de leverancier - **Bedrijf**: Ideagen - **Opgericht**: 1993 ## Commerciële context - **Prijsmodel**: (Gratis proef) - **Doelgroep**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementatie en platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (desktop) - **Ondersteunde talen**: Engels - **Beschikbare landen**: Australië, Verenigd Koninkrijk, Verenigde Staten ## Functies - Auditbeheer - Beheer van offerteaanvragen - Compliancebeheer - Contactenbeheer - Controle van goedkeuringsbeheer - Document Check-in/Check-out - Documentbeheer - Documenten controleren - Documenten opslaan - Elektronische handtekening - Herinneringen - Kwaliteitscontrole - Offline toegang - Op rollen gebaseerde toestemmingen - Opmerkingen/notities - Revisiegeschiedenis - Samenwerkingstools - Sjablonen - Toegangsopties/machtigingen - Veranderingsbeheer ## Ondersteuningsopties - E-mail/helpdesk - Telefonische ondersteuning ## Categorie - [Collaboration software](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/335/web-collaboration/software) ## Gerelateerde categorieën - [Collaboration software](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/335/web-collaboration/software) - [Content collaboration software](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/3796/content-collaboration/software) - [Offertesoftware](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/340/proposal-management/software) - [DMS-systemen](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/284/document-management/software) - [Documentbeheer software](https://www.getapp.nl/directory/1175/document-control/software) ## Alternatieven 1. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.getapp.nl/software/104305/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (527 reviews) 2. [Zoho Sign](https://www.getapp.nl/software/112435/zoho-sign) — 4.5/5 (84 reviews) 3. [M-Files](https://www.getapp.nl/software/91125/m-files-dms) — 4.4/5 (274 reviews) 4. [Qualio](https://www.getapp.nl/software/100136/qualio) — 4.6/5 (128 reviews) 5. [DigiSigner](https://www.getapp.nl/software/2052053/digisigner) — 4.8/5 (1450 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Useful but there's room for improvement" — 4.0/5 > **Geverifieerde reviewer** | *16 februari 2023* | Farmaceutica | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Being able to review a document in parallel with internal and external colleagues. > > **Minpunten**: It would be useful to be able to magnify the document to fit the type of screen it is viewed on and to quickly get to specific comments that colleagues have replied to without scrolling through the document. > > Good but could be better with some small improvements. ----- ### "Validation of PleaseReview for Veeva vault integration for a client" — 4.0/5 > **Geverifieerde reviewer** | *22 september 2025* | Farmaceutica | Aanbevelingsscore: 9.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: i had supported a client in validation of PleaseReview with Veeva Vault. We had generated UAT Test Scripts with scenarios where we routed documents for collab authoring cycle and review of the documents. The integration was easy and and showed the users what changes/updates are being made and the Author could accept/reject them with reason or not. Good tool to have real time updates being made on a document which assisted in reducing the time to review the document with stakeholders. > > **Minpunten**: A couple of things I noticed while dry running the UAT scripts is how the document is displayed when opened in PleaseReview. We had created a sample test document with grammatical errors and mistakes so as to have them updated in collab authoring cycle. if the paragraph is short on a single page document the UI shows only that section zoomed in and not the whole page as compared to in Microsoft word document. It would be better if it showed the whole page while making any updates. Also the Header and Footer are not displayed when a user opens the document for review or collab authoring cycle. would like to see that too in future updates. > > We validated PleaseReview with Veeva Vault QMS for collaborative authoring and review cycles. The integration was smooth and made it easy for users to see real-time updates and accept or reject changes, which really sped up stakeholder reviews. A couple of areas for improvement would be showing the full page (instead of zooming in on short sections) and displaying headers/footers during reviews. Overall, it’s a very useful tool that made the document review process much more efficient. ----- ### "Works great for Color Team Reviews" — 5.0/5 > **Brittony** | *9 oktober 2020* | Lucht- en ruimtevaart | Aanbevelingsscore: 9.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: I use PleaseReview for Red Team reviews. I load my documents into the software, give authorization to my reviewers all over the company and they can enter comments, show how they would edit text and determine if it's minor or major. Reviewers see each other's comments and can discuss differences. I can determine how long the reviewers have to review and then download the document back into Word with comments. > > **Minpunten**: We tried to use it as a collaborative vehicle for writing and it didn't work very well for that. Each author had to be assigned a section and then it got complicated. We abandoned that path. One issue we have is authorizing people outside or heritage group after we merged with another company. Only heritage can use it. > > We use it for all our non-advocate reviews and it works great for those we can give access to. ----- ### "Great software and must try\!\!" — 5.0/5 > **Allison** | *4 april 2025* | Lucht- en ruimtevaart | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Minpunten**: Not sure as I am only a user. Everything works well for me > > Its user friendly and you can do what you need for your business. The people are easy to work with. Responsive ## Links - [Bekijk op GetApp](https://www.getapp.nl/software/121535/ideagen-proposal-management-software) ## Deze pagina is beschikbaar in de volgende talen | Locatie | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Gestructureerde gegevens